Sivas Cumhuriyet University, Faculty of Architecture, Department of Urban and Regional Planning, Fine Arts and Design, Sivas, Türkiye
Abstract
Cities, particularly at the metropolitan scale, tend to expand outward over time. In the long term, urban sprawl generates a range of environmental, social, and economic challenges. The physical dimension of urban sprawl manifests as urban fragmentation and loss of central strength. Accordingly, developing methods to quantify fragmentation is essential for understanding urban growth trajectories. A city’s fragmentation and outward expansion are often two interrelated phenomena that influence one another, typically accompanied by a decrease in density in the city’s central area. This study selected districts from eight different metropoles from Turkey to propose a grid-based method for creating Urban Fragmentation Index (FRAG) and Central Dominance Index (CDI). The correlation between these two variables was subsequently examined using data from eight case studies. Although the results indicated a moderate positive correlation between the two, the significance level test presented that this relationship was not statistically significant. Therefore, future studies can employ this method—which is easily applicable and repeatable in any city—using larger samples to elucidate the interplay between these two significant factors.
ERAY, S. S. (2026). A Practical Method for Assessing Urban Fragmentation and City-Center Dominance at the Metropolitan Scale. MAS Journal of Applied Sciences, 11(3), 468–480. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20806341
📄Burger, M.J., Meijers, E.J., 2012. Form follows function? Linking morphological and functional polycentricity. Urban Studies, 49(5): 1127-1149.
📄Davoudi, S., 2003. Polycentricity in European spatial planning: From an analytical tool to a normative agenda. European Planning Studies, 11(8): 979-999.
📄Frazier, A.E., Kedron, P.J., 2017. Landscape metrics: Past progress and future directions. Current Landscape Ecology Reports, 2(3): 63-72.
📄Freestone, R., Baker, D., 2011. Spatial planning models and airport-driven urban development. Journal of Planning Literature, 26(3): 263-279.
📄Gachowski, M., Walusiak, Ł., 2025. Urban phenomena in Lesser Poland through GIS-based metrics: An exceptional form of urban sprawl challenging sustainable development. Sustainability, 17(21): 9394.
📄Gielen, E., Riutort-Mayol, G., Palencia-Jiménez, J.S., Cantarino, I., 2017. An urban sprawl index based on multivariate and Bayesian factor analysis with application at the municipality level in Valencia. Environment and Planning B: Urban Analytics and City Science, 45(5): 888-914.
📄Güller, C., Varol, C., 2026. Evaluating the morphological and functional centrality: An integrated approach to spatial structure. Applied Spatial Analysis and Policy, 19(1): 1-29.
📄Herold, M., Goldstein, N.C., Clarke, K.C., 2002. The spatiotemporal form of urban growth: Measurement, analysis and modeling. Remote Sensing of Environment, 86(2003): 286-302.
📄Khodabandeh, A., Shahabi Shahmiri, M., 2025. Transformation of spatial structure from monocentric to polycentric: The case of Qazvin Province, Iran. IJPP: Italian Journal of Planning Practice, 15(1): 105-128.
📄Meijers, E.J., 2008. Measuring polycentricity and its promises. European Planning Studies, 16(9): 1313-1323.
📄Oliveira, V., Pinho, P., 2010. Evaluation in urban planning: Advances and prospects. Journal of Planning Literature, 24(4): 343-361.
📄Saeidishirvan, S., Dadashpoor, H., Refieian, M., 2026. Regional polycentricity and spatial disparities: Panacea or outcome? Evidence from the Tehran metropolitan region, Iran. Regional Science Policy & Practice, 18(2): 100276.
📄Salvati, L., Venanzoni, G., Serra, P., Carlucci, M., 2016. Scattered or polycentric? Untangling urban growth in three southern European metropolitan regions through exploratory spatial data analysis. The Annals of Regional Science, 57(1): 1-29.
📄Schneider, A., Woodcock, C.E., 2008. Compact, dispersed, fragmented, extensive? A comparison of urban growth in twenty-five global cities using remotely sensed data, pattern metrics and census information. Urban Studies, 45(3): 659-692.
📄Schwarz, N., 2010. Urban form revisited—Selecting indicators for characterizing European cities. Landscape and Urban Planning, 96(1): 29-47.
📄Sertel, E., Topaloğlu, R.H., Şallı, B., Yay Algan, I., Aksu, G.A., 2018. Comparison of landscape metrics for three different level land cover/land use maps. ISPRS International Journal of Geo-Information, 7(10): 408.
📄Turner, M.G., Chapin, F.S., 2005. Causes and consequences of spatial heterogeneity in ecosystem function. In G.M. Lovett, M.G. Turner, C.G. Jones, K.C. Weathers (Eds.), Ecosystem function in heterogeneous landscapes (pp. 9-30). New York, NY: Springer.
📄Torrens, P.M., 2008. A toolkit for measuring sprawl. Applied Spatial Analysis and Policy, 1(1): 5-36.
📄Wu, F., Zhang, F., Webster, C., 2024. Polycentric urban development and spatial restructuring in globalizing cities. Urban Geography, 45(3): 421-440.
📄Wu, H., Ming, Y., Liu, Y., 2024. Investigating the influence of morphologic and functional polycentric structures on urban heat island: A case of Chongqing, China. Sustainable Cities and Society, 114: 105790.
📄Young, C.H., Jarvis, P.J., 2001. Measuring urban habitat fragmentation: An example from the Black Country, UK. Landscape Ecology, 16(7): 643-658.
📄Zambon, I., Colantoni, A., Carlucci, M., Morrow, N., Sateriano, A., Salvati, L., 2017. Land quality, sustainable development and environmental degradation in agricultural districts: A computational approach based on entropy indexes. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 64: 37-46.