Open Access

A Practical Method for Assessing Urban Fragmentation and City-Center Dominance at the Metropolitan Scale

Sivas Cumhuriyet University, Faculty of Architecture, Department of Urban and Regional Planning, Fine Arts and Design, Sivas, Türkiye

Abstract

Cities, particularly at the metropolitan scale, tend to expand outward over time. In the long term, urban sprawl generates a range of environmental, social, and economic challenges. The physical dimension of urban sprawl manifests as urban fragmentation and loss of central strength. Accordingly, developing methods to quantify fragmentation is essential for understanding urban growth trajectories. A city’s fragmentation and outward expansion are often two interrelated phenomena that influence one another, typically accompanied by a decrease in density in the city’s central area. This study selected districts from eight different metropoles from Turkey to propose a grid-based method for creating Urban Fragmentation Index (FRAG) and Central Dominance Index (CDI). The correlation between these two variables was subsequently examined using data from eight case studies. Although the results indicated a moderate positive correlation between the two, the significance level test presented that this relationship was not statistically significant. Therefore, future studies can employ this method—which is easily applicable and repeatable in any city—using larger samples to elucidate the interplay between these two significant factors.

Keywords

How to Cite

ERAY, S. S. (2026). A Practical Method for Assessing Urban Fragmentation and City-Center Dominance at the Metropolitan Scale. MAS Journal of Applied Sciences, 11(3), 468–480. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20806341

References

📄 Burger, M.J., Meijers, E.J., 2012. Form follows function? Linking morphological and functional polycentricity. Urban Studies, 49(5): 1127-1149.
📄 Davoudi, S., 2003. Polycentricity in European spatial planning: From an analytical tool to a normative agenda. European Planning Studies, 11(8): 979-999.
📄 Frazier, A.E., Kedron, P.J., 2017. Landscape metrics: Past progress and future directions. Current Landscape Ecology Reports, 2(3): 63-72.
📄 Freestone, R., Baker, D., 2011. Spatial planning models and airport-driven urban development. Journal of Planning Literature, 26(3): 263-279.
📄 Gachowski, M., Walusiak, Ł., 2025. Urban phenomena in Lesser Poland through GIS-based metrics: An exceptional form of urban sprawl challenging sustainable development. Sustainability, 17(21): 9394.