1 Tatvan District Directorate of Agriculture and Forestry, Bitlis, Türkiye
2 Van Yüzüncü Yıl University, Faculty of Agriculture, Department of Horticulture, Van, Türkiye
3 Van Yüzüncü Yıl University, Başkale Vocational School, Department of Plant and Animal Production, Organic Farming Program, Van, Türkiye
Abstract
Light affects plant growth and fruit quality. Local pear genotypes from Muş region (Eastern Anatolia, Türkiye) have not been evaluated for their responses to contrasting light conditions. This study compared 13 local genotypes and 4 standard cultivars under natural sun and shade. Under shade, leaf area increased by 9.8–11.2%, highest in Mor Armut (55.56 cm²), Abbasi (49.12 cm²) and Santa Maria (46.66 cm²). Şuti and Pamukhala increased petiole angle. Stomatal density was higher under sun (Abbasi: 422, Mihrani: 402 mm⁻²) and decreased by 17.3% under shade. Güz‑1 maintained stomatal density but increased stomatal length (24.95→29.58 µm) and pore length (18.04→21.74 µm). SPAD showed strong genotype × light interaction: Abbasi increased SPAD under shade (52.08→56.00), whereas Pamukhala, Mihrani and Yaz Armudu decreased. Fruit weight was highest in Paşa‑2 (274.36 g), SSC in Güz‑1 (19.8%) and Mor Armut (19.7%), and flesh firmness in Van Armudu (11.01 kg cm⁻²) and Güz‑1 (9.98 kg cm⁻²). Pearson correlations revealed very strong positive relationships between leaf area and width (r=0.933) and among fruit dimensions (r>0.88) under sun; a strong negative correlation between acidity and pH (r=-0.813) under shade. PCA explained 39.4% (sun) and 38.2% (shade) of variance. Hierarchical clustering showed two main clusters under both conditions. Local genotypes (especially Abbasi, Mor Armut, Güz‑1, Paşa‑2) exhibited higher phenotypic plasticity and three shade adaptation strategies: increasing leaf area, increasing stomatal/pore dimensions, and reducing stomatal density while altering petiole angle. These findings highlight the value of Muş pear genetic resources for breeding and climate adaptation.
AYKUT, S., DOĞAN , A., & BAYTİN ALACI, R. (2026). Leaf Morphological, Stomatal and Colorimetric Responses of Local and Standard Pear Genotypes to Sun and Shade Conditions. MAS Journal of Applied Sciences, 11(2), 378–404. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20594800
📄Aykut, S., Doğan, A., 2024. Selection of pear gene resources in Muş region. Journal of Agricultural Faculty of Gaziosmanpaşa University, 40(3): 141–154.
📄Beckles, D.M., 2012. Factors affecting the postharvest soluble solids and sugar content of tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L.) fruit. Postharvest Biology and Technology, 63(1): 129–140.
📄Bohra, A., Kilian, B., Sivasankar, S., Caccamo, M., Mba, C., McCouch, S.R., Varshney, R.K., 2022. Reap the crop wild relatives for breeding future crops. Trends in Biotechnology, 40(4): 412–431.
📄Buschmann, C., Lenk, S., Lichtenthaler, H.K., 2012. Reflectance spectra and images of green leaves with different tissue structure and chlorophyll content. Israel Journal of Plant Sciences, 60(1–2): 49–64.
📄Cervantes, L., Ariza, M.T., Gomez-Mora, J.A., Miranda, L., Medina, J.J., Soria, C., Martinez-Ferri, E., 2019. Light exposure affects fruit quality in different strawberry cultivars under field conditions. Scientia Horticulturae, 252: 291–297.
📄Drake, P.L., Froend, R.H., Franks, P.J., 2013. Smaller, faster stomata: Scaling of stomatal size, rate of response, and stomatal conductance. Journal of Experimental Botany, 64(2): 495–505.
📄Esteban, R., Barrutia, O., Artetxe, U., Fernández-Marín, B., Hernández, A., García-Plazaola, J.I., 2015. Internal and external factors affecting photosynthetic pigment composition in plants: A meta-analytical approach. New Phytologist, 206(1): 268–280.
📄Fotirić-Aksić, M., Cerović, R., Radošević, R., Oparnica, C., Meland, M., 2021. Morphological and anatomical leaf characteristics of some European and Asian pear cultivars. Acta Horticulturae, 1303: 63–70).
📄Gisbert, C., Soler, J.X., Fos, M., Intrigliolo, D.S., Yuste, A., Picó, B., Torrent, D., Peiró, R., 2022. Characterization of local Mediterranean grapevine varieties for their resilience to semi-arid conditions under a rain-fed regime. Agronomy, 12(9): 2234.
📄Gitelson, A.A., Merzlyak, M.N., Chivkunova, O.B., 2001. Optical properties and nondestructive estimation of anthocyanin content in plant leaves. Photochemistry and Photobiology, 74: 38–45.
📄Gitelson, A.A., Zur, Y., Chivkunova, O.B., Merzlyak, M.N., 2002. Assessing carotenoid content in plant leaves with reflectance spectroscopy. Photochemistry and Photobiology, 75: 272–281.
📄Givnish, T.J., 1988. Adaptation to sun and shade: A whole-plant perspective. Australian Journal of Plant Physiology, 15(1–2): 63–92.
📄Gould, K.S., McKelvie, J., Markham, K.R., 2002. Do anthocyanins function as antioxidants in leaves? Imaging of H₂O₂ in red and green leaves after mechanical injury. Plant, Cell & Environment, 25(10): 1261–1269.
📄Hetherington, A.M., Woodward, F.I., 2003. The role of stomata in sensing and driving environmental change. Nature, 424(6951): 901–908.
📄Husson, F., Josse, J., Le, S., 2024. FactoMineR: Multivariate exploratory data analysis and data mining (R package version 2.11) (Computer software).
📄Kalkışım, O., Aydın, M. Z., Özdeş, D., Duran, C., 2025. Determination of selection-focused physicochemical properties in the local Eğrisap pear (Pyrus communis L.) clone grown in Rize. South African Journal of Botany, 184: 18–25.
📄Kassambara, A., Mundt, F., 2016. Factoextra: extract and visualize the results of multivariate data analyses. CRAN: Contributed Packages.
📄Kırca, L., Aygün, A., 2025. Phenotypic diversity and biochemical properties of Pyrus elaeagnifolia Pall. genotypes: A comprehensive study from Western Türkiye. Horticulturae, 11(8): 934.
📄Konarska, A., 2013. The relationship between the morphology and structure and the quality of fruits of two pear cultivars (Pyrus communis L.) during their development and maturation. The Scientific World Journal, 2013: 846796.
📄Lichtenthaler, H.K., Babani, F. 2004. Light adaptation and senescence of the photosynthetic apparatus. Changes in pigment composition, chlorophyll fluorescence parameters and photosynthetic activity. In Chlorophyll a fluorescence: a signature of photosynthesi (pp. 713-736). Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands.
📄Lichtenthaler, H.K., Miehé, J.A., 1997. Fluorescence imaging as a diagnostic tool for plant stress. Trends in Plant Science, 2(8): 316–320.
📄Malladi, A., Johnson, L.K., 2011. Expression profiling of cell cycle genes reveals key regulators of organ growth in apple fruit. Physiologia Plantarum, 142(4): 377–390.
📄McGuire, R.G., 1992. Reporting of objective color measurements. HortScience, 27(12): 1254–1255.
📄Nicotra, A.B., Atkin, O.K., Bonser, S.P., Davidson, A.M., Finnegan, E.J., Mathesius, U., Poot, P., Purugganan, M.D., Richards, C.L., Valladares, F., van Kleunen, M., 2010. Plant phenotypic plasticity in a changing climate. Trends in Plant Science, 15(12): 684–692.
📄Özbek, S., 1978. Genel meyvecilik. Çukurova Üniversitesi Yayınları. No: 128. Adana.
📄Özelçi, D., 2026. Phenotypic, phytochemical and mineral characterization of wild Prunus cerasifera genotypes from Eastern Anatolia. BMC Plant Biology, 26, 463.
📄Parvin, P., Gharaghani, A., Khosravi, A., Eshghi, S., 2023. Phenotypic characterization of Pyrus glabra Boiss. and P. syriaca Boiss.: implications for conservation and utilization. Trees, 37: 1537–1554.
📄Piluzza, G., Campesi, G., D’hallewin, G., Molinu, M.G., Re, G.A., Sanna, F., Sulas, L., 2023. Antioxidants in fruit fractions of Mediterranean ancient pear cultivars. Molecules, 28(8): 3559.
📄Rajametov, Sh., 2017. Changes in chlorophyll content and stomatal parameters in wild pear species during summer. Genetics and Plant Physiology, 7(1–2): 78–88.
📄Sims, D.A., Gamon, J.A., 2002. Relationships between leaf pigment content and spectral reflectance across a wide range of species, leaf structures and developmental stages. Remote Sensing of Environment, 81(2–3): 337–354.
📄Team, R.C. 2020. RA language and environment for statistical computing, R Foundation for Statistical. Computing.
📄Uddling, J., Gelang-Alfredsson, J., Piikki, K., Pleijel, H., 2007. Evaluating the relationship between leaf chlorophyll concentration and SPAD-502 chlorophyll meter readings. Photosynthesis Research, 91: 37–46.
📄Valladares, F., Niinemets, Ü., 2008. Shade tolerance, a key plant feature of complex nature and consequences. Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics, 39: 237–257.
📄Wei, T., Simko, V. 2010. corrplot: Visualization of a correlation matrix. CRAN: Contributed Packages.
📄Yılmaz, K.U., Uzun, A., Çam, M., Ercişli, S., 2015. Some morphological and fruit characteristics of naturally grown Pyrus elaeagnifolia Pall. of Kayseri Province (Central Anatolia, Türkiye). Genetic Resources and Crop Evolution, 62: 711–720.